La Fitte v. La Fitte
2 Serg. & Rawle 107
This text of 2 Serg. & Rawle 107 (La Fitte v. La Fitte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
La Fitte v. La Fitte, 2 Serg. & Rawle 107 (Pa. 1815).
Opinion
The affidavit made by one of the defendants is sufficient. The recognisance being for all the defendants, the appeal stands for all. But if either of them comes into Court and desires to be severed, he may do it, and then the appeal will go on in the name of the others. This is according to our decision in Gallagher v. Jackson.
Motion refused.
1 Ser. & Rep. 492.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hartman v. Stahl
2 Pen. & W. 223 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1830)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Serg. & Rawle 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-fitte-v-la-fitte-pa-1815.