La Fera Contracting Co. v. Commissioner

1971 T.C. Memo. 161, 30 T.C.M. 691, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 171
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 12, 1971
DocketDocket No. 424-70.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1971 T.C. Memo. 161 (La Fera Contracting Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Fera Contracting Co. v. Commissioner, 1971 T.C. Memo. 161, 30 T.C.M. 691, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 171 (tax 1971).

Opinion

La Fera Contracting Company v. Commissioner.
La Fera Contracting Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 424-70.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1971-161; 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 171; 30 T.C.M. (CCH) 691; T.C.M. (RIA) 71161;
July 12, 1971, Filed
Martin D. Cohen, 744 Broad St., Newark, N.J., and Samuel Klein, for the petitioner. John J. Hopkins, for the respondent.

QUEALY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

QUEALY, Judge: The respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for the taxable year ended September 30, 1964 in the amount of $5,214.02.

Other issues having been previously disposed of, the parties filed a stipulation at trial in which the petitioner conceded the respondent's disallowance of the petitioner's claimed salary deductions.

This stipulation of the parties also sets forth their agreement concerning the disposition of a preferred stock redemption issue. They agreed that with respect to this issue, they would be bound by the ultimate judicial*172 determination in the consolidated trial of Joseph Miele, et al., 56 T.C. No. 45. (Docket Nos. 405-70, 421-70, 422-70, 423-70). In the Miele case, we found and held that the preferred stock redemptions were essentially equivalent to a dividend and did not qualify as a distribution or payment in exchange for stock under section 302(a). Therefore in accordance with the stipulation of the parties, we hold the preferred stock redemptions in question in the instant case were essentially equivalent to a dividend and do not qualify for section 302(a) treatment.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John L. Kane, Jr. v. United States
43 F.3d 1446 (Federal Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1971 T.C. Memo. 161, 30 T.C.M. 691, 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-fera-contracting-co-v-commissioner-tax-1971.