La Farge v. Luce

1 Wend. 73
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1828
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wend. 73 (La Farge v. Luce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Farge v. Luce, 1 Wend. 73 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Opinion

In the affidavit of attendance of witnesses, their names must be stated.

Motion for retaxation of costs, A bill of costs was taxed against the plaintiff for not proceeding to trial pursuant to notice. On the taxation, an allowance for fees to witnesses was objected to, unless their names were specified in the affidavit of attendance. The commissioner overruled the objection. A motion was now made for relaxation for that cause, ! granted by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wend. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-farge-v-luce-nysupct-1828.