La Dow v. E. Bement & Sons

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

La Dow v. E. Bement & Sons

66 F. 198, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3059

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1895

DocketNo. 6,054

StatusPublished

This text of 66 F. 198 (La Dow v. E. Bement & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

La Dow v. E. Bement & Sons, 66 F. 198, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3059 (circtndny 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

The defendant in the original suit has filed a cross bill in which he prays that the licenses in question may be declared valid and that the complainants in the original suit may be directed to account for and pay over the royalties due on such licenses. The court sees no reason why the prayer of the cross bill should not be granted, but as the subject was not discussed at the argument any question arising on the cross bill may be reserved for decision until the settlement of the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge.

The defendant in the original suit has filed a cross bill in which he prays that the licenses in question may be declared valid and that the complainants in the original suit may be directed to account for and pay over the royalties due on such licenses. The court sees no reason why the prayer of the cross bill should not be granted, but as the subject was not discussed at the argument any question arising on the cross bill may be reserved for decision until the settlement of the decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 F. 198, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-dow-v-e-bement-sons-circtndny-1895.