La Conception.

19 U.S. 235, 5 L. Ed. 249, 6 Wheat. 235, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 359
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1821
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 19 U.S. 235 (La Conception.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Conception., 19 U.S. 235, 5 L. Ed. 249, 6 Wheat. 235, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 359 (1821).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Story

delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, if the cause had stood solely upon the evidence before the Circuit Court, we should have no difficulty in affirming its decision. But upon the new proofs which have been since taken, and are now produced to this Court, it is apparent that the capturing vessel was originally built, equipped, manned, and armed in the United States for a cruize, being owned by citizens of this country, and *239 sailed with the intent of cruizing against Spain. It is true that she went to Buenos Ayres, ánd sailed under the colours of that government on a second cruize, during which this capture was made ; -but, there is no satisfactory evidence that the American ownership ever ceased, or that there was a real, bona fide sale at Buenos Ayres. If such a sale had really taken place, it was perfectly in the power o’f the captors to have proved it, in the clearest manner. A bill of sale is the customary and universal document by which the ownership of vessels is evidenced ; and the want of any document of this nature, or of any direct and positive evidence of an actual sale, leaves no doubt m the mind of the Court, that no such sale ever was made. The consequence is, that the capturing vessel must still be considered, as owned in the United States; and, according to the decisions which have already been made, the capture was illegal, and the property must be restored to the original Spanish owners.

Sentence reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. United States
1 Ct. Cl. 113 (Court of Claims, 1864)
Novion v. Hallett
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 4 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1799)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 U.S. 235, 5 L. Ed. 249, 6 Wheat. 235, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-conception-scotus-1821.