Home/New York Court of Appeals/La Carrubba v. Klein

La Carrubba v. Klein

389 N.E.2d 838, 46 N.Y.2d 1009, 416 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1923
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 27, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 389 N.E.2d 838 (La Carrubba v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Carrubba v. Klein, 389 N.E.2d 838, 46 N.Y.2d 1009, 416 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1923 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the majority opinion of Mr. Justice J. Irwin Shapiro at the Appellate Division. We note for the record that the proposed constitutional amendment referred to in that opinion (59 AD2d 99, 103-104), having been agreed to by a second Legislature, was approved and ratified, effective as of April 1, 1978, by a majority of the State’s electors at a general election and has been in force since then (NY Const, art VI, §§ 22, 36-a; see, also, Judiciary Law, art 2-A).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

[1011]*1011Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duffy v. Ward
182 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
County of Broome v. Conte
120 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Ginsberg v. Purcell
414 N.E.2d 648 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Ginsberg v. Purcell
74 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 N.E.2d 838, 46 N.Y.2d 1009, 416 N.Y.S.2d 243, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-carrubba-v-klein-ny-1979.