La Cagnina v. Messeneo

246 A.D. 619

This text of 246 A.D. 619 (La Cagnina v. Messeneo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Cagnina v. Messeneo, 246 A.D. 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits in an action for an accounting reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of the opinion that finding of fact XI in the decision, to the effect that the defendants, at and prior to the purchase of the premises in question, did not conceal any offer or offers from the plaintiff and his assignor, is against the weight of the evidence. There are contrary findings made by the court at the request of plaintiff’s attorney, which cannot be struck outer reversed, as there is sufficient evidence to support them. Under these circumstances, we are of the opinion that a new trial should be had. Young, Hagerty, CarsweE, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-cagnina-v-messeneo-nyappdiv-1935.