La Breck v. Kelm
This text of 281 A.D. 942 (La Breck v. Kelm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and Piper, J., who dissent and vote for affirmance, on the ground that the record presents only questions of fact which were properly determined by the jury. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant for no cause of action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — • Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 942, 119 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-breck-v-kelm-nyappdiv-1953.