La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated
187 A. 36, 117 N.J.L. 115, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 318
This text of 187 A. 36 (La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated, 187 A. 36, 117 N.J.L. 115, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1936).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 10.
For reversal — N one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 A. 36, 117 N.J.L. 115, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-bett-v-heyman-brothers-incorporated-nj-1936.