La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated
187 A. 36, 117 N.J.L. 115, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 318
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 10.
For reversal — N one.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated, 187 A. 36, 117 N.J.L. 115, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1936).
187 A. 36 (La Bett v. Heyman Brothers, Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.