La Belle v. Joint Venture of Herkert & La Belle
This text of 295 A.D.2d 797 (La Belle v. Joint Venture of Herkert & La Belle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Sheridan, J.), entered April 5, 2001 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, granted a cross motion by defendants Joint Venture of Herkert & La Belle, John Herkert, Sr. and John Herkert, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.
As plaintiffs’ action was commenced in July 1999 for defendants’ breach of contract occurring in October 1990, the action is untimely (see, CPLR 213 [2]). For the reasons stated by Supreme Court in rejecting plaintiffs’ claims that defendants’ purported partial payment tolled the statute of limitations, the cross motion by defendants Joint Venture of Herkert & La Belle, John Herkert, Sr. and John Herkert, Jr. for summary judgment was properly granted (see, Saini v Cinelli Enters., 289 AD2d 770, 771-772, lv denied 98 NY2d 602).
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 A.D.2d 797, 743 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-belle-v-joint-venture-of-herkert-la-belle-nyappdiv-2002.