La Belle v. Barclays Capital Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn BRIAN LA BELLE, : : ORDER Plaintiff, : 19 Civ. 3800 (JPO) (GWG) -V.-

BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.,

Defendant. : wn GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge At a conference held today the Court asked defendant to supply by October 14, 2021, a letter providing explanation for the citation in Docket # 164 to DeLorenzo v. Spartan Sec. Services, Inc., 2018 WL 3979597 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2018). Upon reviewing DeLorenzo, the Court believes that the defendant’s citation was proper. Accordingly, the Court vacates its oral directive to provide further explanation of that citation. However, the Court adheres to its decision that the reasons for Argentic’s decision to reduce Plaintiff's bonus amount is of insufficient relevance to the claims or defenses in this case under Rule 26(b) to require production. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2021 New York, New York Soe 0 Grose United States Magistrate Judge