L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States
319 U.S. 729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 U.S. 1 →
Opinion
It is ordered that the opinion of this Court be amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
“We have considered appellant’s attack on the suffi[730]*730ciency of the evidence to support the Commission’s findings, and conclude, as did the court below, that they are adequately supported by substantial evidence of record. Compare Florida v. United States, 292 U. S. 1, 12; Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United States, supra, 508.”
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 729 (1943).
319 U.S. 729 (L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida v. United States
292 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1934)