L. Straus & Sons v. Wanamaker
34 A. 648, 175 Pa. 213, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1238
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 27, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 160·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
The correctness of the learned'referee’s rulings, on which the judgment is based, is so amply vindicated in his very able and exhaustive report, that it is wholly unnecessary for us to add anything thereto. We are all satisfied from an examination of the record that there is nothing therein to justify us in sustaining any of the specifications of error.
The judgment is therefore affirmed on the report of the referee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
L. Straus & Sons v. Wanamaker, 34 A. 648, 175 Pa. 213, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1238 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 648 (L. Straus & Sons v. Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mealey v. Kanealy
286 N.W. 500 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Du Puy v. United States
35 F.2d 990 (Court of Claims, 1929)
Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.
124 A. 493 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Baldwin v. Magen
123 A. 815 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.
174 Iowa 476 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
Fee v. Emporium Lumber Co.
50 Pa. Super. 557 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Evans's Estate
47 Pa. Super. 196 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Henne v. Summers
116 P. 86 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Keiser v. Reading Suburban Real Estate Co.
43 Pa. Super. 130 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Royle Mining Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
103 S.W. 1098 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Morrow
143 F. 750 (Sixth Circuit, 1906)
Bean v. Aetna Life Ins.
111 Tenn. 186 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Silliman v. William Whitmer & Sons
11 Pa. Super. 243 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)