L & S Hospital & Institutional Supplies, Inc. v. Lefkowitz

54 A.D.2d 734, 387 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14351
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondents from acting beyond their authority and to quash a certain subpoena, petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 11, 1976, which (1) granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition and (2) dismissed the petition. Order and judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The powers conferred upon the Attorney-General’s office by subdivision 3 of section 63 of the Executive Law were properly activated by the requests from the State Commissioners of Health and of Social Services (see Matter of L&S Hosp. & Institutional Supplies Co. v Hynes, 51 AD2d 515, affg 84 Misc 2d 431). The appointment of a Deputy Attorney-General to exercise such powers, including the issuance of subpoenaes on behalf of a Grand Jury, was proper (see Matter of Shapiro v Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., 84 Misc 2d 938, 943; Matter of L & S Hosp. & Institutional Supplies Co. v Hynes, supra). Respondents’ renewed application to dismiss the appeal is denied. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L & S Hospital & Institutional Supplies, Inc. v. Lefkowitz, 54 A.D.2d 734, 387 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 734 (L & S Hospital & Institutional Supplies, Inc. v. Lefkowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Kuriansky
158 Misc. 2d 797 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Landau v. Hynes
400 N.E.2d 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)