L. Ruther v. Us Sprint Communications Company
This text of 37 F.3d 1495 (L. Ruther v. Us Sprint Communications Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
L. RUTHER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
US SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, Defendant Appellee.
No. 93-2252.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted January 3, 1994.
Decided October 7, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (MISC-93-131-5-BR)
L. Ruther, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis because Appellant's claims are frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34874, 1994 WL 551358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-ruther-v-us-sprint-communications-company-ca4-1994.