L. R. Spires v. Mary Leemann

Court of Appeals of Texas

L. R. Spires v. Mary Leemann

173 S.W.2d 206, 1943 Tex. App. LEXIS 455

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 4, 1943

DocketNo. 2376.

StatusPublished

This text of 173 S.W.2d 206 (L. R. Spires v. Mary Leemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. R. Spires v. Mary Leemann, 173 S.W.2d 206, 1943 Tex. App. LEXIS 455 (Tex. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

The above styled and numbered cause is-a garnishment suit, ancillary to the case of L. R. Spires, Appellant, v. Mary Lee Mann, Executrix, and Clay Mann, Appellees, No. 2370 on the docket of this Court, 173 S.W.2d 200. Since the judgment of the trial court in said principal cause No. 2370 has. been this day affirmed by an opinion rendered by this court, it follows that the judgment in the garnishment proceeding should likewise be affirmed. 20 Tex.Jur. p. 754, Sec. 45, et seq.

It is accordingly so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

The above styled and numbered cause is-a garnishment suit, ancillary to the case of L. R. Spires, Appellant, v. Mary Lee Mann, Executrix, and Clay Mann, Appellees, No. 2370 on the docket of this Court, 173 S.W.2d 200. Since the judgment of the trial court in said principal cause No. 2370 has. been this day affirmed by an opinion rendered by this court, it follows that the judgment in the garnishment proceeding should likewise be affirmed. 20 Tex.Jur. p. 754, Sec. 45, et seq.

It is accordingly so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 S.W.2d 206, 1943 Tex. App. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-r-spires-v-mary-leemann-texapp-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack