L. P. St. Clair v. United States of America, Annastatia St. Clair v. United States
This text of 188 F.2d 576 (L. P. St. Clair v. United States of America, Annastatia St. Clair v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
51-1 USTC P 9289
L. P. ST. CLAIR, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Annastatia ST. CLAIR, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12721.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 9, 1951.
Thomas R. Dempsey, Wellman P. Thayer, Arthur H. Deibert, H. Benjamin Thompson and William L. Kumler, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner, Virginia H. Adams, S. Dee Hanson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Ernest A. Tolin, U.S. Atty., E. H. Mitchell, Edward R. McHale, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, 90 F.Supp. 249, the judgments of the District Court are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 F.2d 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-p-st-clair-v-united-states-of-america-annastatia-ca9-1951.