L. Maxcy, Inc. v. James

158 So. 164, 117 Fla. 641, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1322
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 14, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 158 So. 164 (L. Maxcy, Inc. v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
L. Maxcy, Inc. v. James, 158 So. 164, 117 Fla. 641, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1322 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On January 1, 1924, a mortgage was executed covering described lands. In 1925 a statute was enacted permitting the giving of chattel mortgages upon fruit crops to be grown upon lands. In July, 1930, a mortgage was executed upon citrus crops growing or to be grown upon lands covered by the above stated mortgage upon described lands. On June 15, 1933, suit was begun to foreclose the mortgage of 1924 upon the lands, for default which occurred in 1928.

*642 The holder of the fruit chattel mortgage by answer-claimed priority as to the growing fruit on the trees on the land over the holder of the mortgage on the real estate. •This answer was stricken and an appeal was taken therefrom. The order appealed from should -be affirmed on the authority of Summerlin v. Orange Shores, Inc., 97 Fla. 996, 122 So. 508.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. Summit Realty Co., Inc.
162 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 164, 117 Fla. 641, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-maxcy-inc-v-james-fla-1934.