L & M Co. v. New York State Department of Labor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

L & M Co. v. New York State Department of Labor

144 A.D.2d 677, 535 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 28, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 677 (L & M Co. v. New York State Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L & M Co. v. New York State Department of Labor, 144 A.D.2d 677, 535 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Commissioner of Labor dated April 28, 1987, which found, inter alia, that the petitioner willfully failed to pay prevailing wages on a public works contract in violation of Labor Law § 220, the petitioner appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered December 4, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding as time barred, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered May 19, 1988, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

[678]*678Ordered that the appeal from the order entered December 4, 1987, is dismissed as that order was superseded by the order entered May 19, 1988; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered May 19, 1988, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding as untimely commenced (see, Labor Law § 220 [8]; § 220-b [2]; cf, Pagliaroli v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 66 AD2d 997; Matter of Trotta v Board of Trustees, 51 AD2d 526). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Commissioner of Labor dated April 28, 1987, which found, inter alia, that the petitioner willfully failed to pay prevailing wages on a public works contract in violation of Labor Law § 220, the petitioner appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.), entered December 4, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding as time barred, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court entered May 19, 1988, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

[678]*678Ordered that the appeal from the order entered December 4, 1987, is dismissed as that order was superseded by the order entered May 19, 1988; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered May 19, 1988, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding as untimely commenced (see, Labor Law § 220 [8]; § 220-b [2]; cf, Pagliaroli v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 66 AD2d 997; Matter of Trotta v Board of Trustees, 51 AD2d 526). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 677, 535 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-m-co-v-new-york-state-department-of-labor-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack