L. M. AND O. M. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
This text of L. M. AND O. M. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES (L. M. AND O. M. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of D.M., a child. ) ___________________________________) ) L.M. and O.M., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-503 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES; GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM; C.G.; and D.M., ) ) Respondents. ) )
Opinion filed May 16, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge.
Lily McCarty Gonzalez of McCarty Gonzalez Pavlidis & Whidden, Tampa, for Petitioners.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent Department of Children and Families.
Laura J. Lee, Sanford, for Respondent Guardian ad Litem Program. No appearance for remaining Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
Denied.
KELLY, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
L. M. AND O. M. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-m-and-o-m-v-dept-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2018.