L J Quitile Kuyendall v. State
This text of L J Quitile Kuyendall v. State (L J Quitile Kuyendall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00939-CR
L. J. QUITILE KUYKENDALL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 178th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1170713
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery. On September 18, 2009, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until October 28, 2009.
A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Boyce.
Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
L J Quitile Kuyendall v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-j-quitile-kuyendall-v-state-texapp-2009.