L. H. Kinard v. Magma Extension Mining Company

Fifth Circuit

L. H. Kinard v. Magma Extension Mining Company

198 F.2d 267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 8, 1952

Docket13768_1

StatusPublished

This text of 198 F.2d 267 (L. H. Kinard v. Magma Extension Mining Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. H. Kinard v. Magma Extension Mining Company, 198 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The district court entered summary judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,000.00 and the interest thereon represented by twelve checks, each for the sum of $500.00. After careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with Judge Hooper’s well considered opinion appearing on pages 55 to 64, inclusive, of the record. For reasons therein sufficiently stated the court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing the plaintiff’s motion to amend his answer; the entry of the summary judgment was proper, and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The district court entered summary judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $6,000.00 and the interest thereon represented by twelve checks, each for the sum of $500.00. After careful consideration, we find ourselves in agreement with Judge Hooper’s well considered opinion appearing on pages 55 to 64, inclusive, of the record. For reasons therein sufficiently stated the court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing the plaintiff’s motion to amend his answer; the entry of the summary judgment was proper, and it is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 F.2d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-h-kinard-v-magma-extension-mining-company-ca5-1952.