L. E. Marks Co. v. S.W. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

L. E. Marks Co. v. S.W. Moore

64 S.W.2d 427, 251 Ky. 66, 1933 Ky. LEXIS 801

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

DecidedOctober 27, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 S.W.2d 427 (L. E. Marks Co. v. S.W. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. E. Marks Co. v. S.W. Moore, 64 S.W.2d 427, 251 Ky. 66, 1933 Ky. LEXIS 801 (Ky. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

This is a companion case to that of L. E. Marks Co. v. Dwight Moore, 251 Ky. 63, - S. W. (2d) —, this day decided. The essential elements creating an estoppel against the appellant to deny that he was operating under the Compensation Act (Ky. St., sec. 4880 et seq.) being present in this case, as they were in the Dwight Moore Case, supra, on the authority of that case it must be held that the judgment of the lower court is correct, and must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

This is a companion case to that of L. E. Marks Co. v. Dwight Moore, 251 Ky. 63, - S. W. (2d) —, this day decided. The essential elements creating an estoppel against the appellant to deny that he was operating under the Compensation Act (Ky. St., sec. 4880 et seq.) being present in this case, as they were in the Dwight Moore Case, supra, on the authority of that case it must be held that the judgment of the lower court is correct, and must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 S.W.2d 427, 251 Ky. 66, 1933 Ky. LEXIS 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-e-marks-co-v-sw-moore-kyctapphigh-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack