L. C. v. Olmstead

138 F.3d 893
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 8, 1998·No. 97-8538·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

L. C., by Johnathan ZIMRING, as guardian ad litem and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Tommy OLMSTEAD, Commissioner of the Department of Human Resources; et al., Defendants- Appellants.

No. 97-8538

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1999.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:95-CV-1210-MHS); Marvin H. Shoob, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and PROPST*, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We remand this case to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion

in Olmstead v. L.C., --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999).

*

Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. C. v. Olmstead, 138 F.3d 893 (11th Cir. 1998).

138 F.3d 893 (L. C. v. Olmstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haddad v. Arnold
784 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (M.D. Florida, 2010)
Williams v. Wasserman
164 F. Supp. 2d 591 (D. Maryland, 2001)
Rodriguez v. DeBuono
44 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Egan v. DeBuono
259 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)