L. C. v. Olmstead
This text of 138 F.3d 893 (L. C. v. Olmstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
L. C., by Johnathan ZIMRING, as guardian ad litem and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Tommy OLMSTEAD, Commissioner of the Department of Human Resources; et al., Defendants- Appellants.
No. 97-8538
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1999.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:95-CV-1210-MHS); Marvin H. Shoob, Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and PROPST*, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
We remand this case to the district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion
in Olmstead v. L.C., --- U.S. ----, 119 S.Ct. 2176, 144 L.Ed.2d 540 (1999).
* Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 F.3d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-c-v-olmstead-ca11-1998.