L. C. Mays Company, Inc., and Lamar C. Mays v. Federal Security Agency, Etc.

Fifth Circuit

L. C. Mays Company, Inc., and Lamar C. Mays v. Federal Security Agency, Etc.

201 F.2d 671, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1953

Docket14172_1

StatusPublished

This text of 201 F.2d 671 (L. C. Mays Company, Inc., and Lamar C. Mays v. Federal Security Agency, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. C. Mays Company, Inc., and Lamar C. Mays v. Federal Security Agency, Etc., 201 F.2d 671, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344 (5th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

201 F.2d 671

L. C. MAYS COMPANY, Inc., and Lamar C. Mays, Appellants,
v.
FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY, etc., Appellee.

No. 14172.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 13, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Herbert W. Christenberry, Judge.

James J. Morrison, New Orleans, La., Rudolph R. Schoemann, New Orleans, La., on the brief, for appellants.

Vincent A. Kleinfeld, Attorney, Dept. of Justice, William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., Federal Security Agency, Washington, D. C., Hilary J. Gaudin, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., Charles B. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., John N. McKay, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., John T. Grigsby, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Selma M. Levine, Attorney, Federal Security Agency, Washington, D. C., of counsel, for appellee.

Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of United States v. Cardiff, 344 U.S. 174, 73 S.Ct. 189, the appeal herein is dismissed on the ground that the controversy has become "moot".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI