L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2

S.D. West Virginia

L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2

DecidedJanuary 13, 2026

Docket3:25-cv-00587

StatusUnknown

This text of L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2 (L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2, (S.D.W. Va. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

HUNTINGTON DIVISION

L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-0587

CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a Motion to Show Cause and for Leave for Additional Time to Serve Process filed by Plaintiff L.C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E.C., a minor child. ECF No. 8 (“Pl.’s Mot.”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. This action arises out of Plaintiff’s American Disability Act claim and associated counts for alleged conduct against a minor that occurred at a Cabell County Board of Education (CCBOE) school that employed Defendant Emily Barker. Compl. 1, ECF No. 1. Since filing the complaint on October 3, 2025, Plaintiff claims she has been unable to locate an address for Defendant Emily Barker after diligent search. Pl.’s Mot. ¶ 10. Plaintiff requests additional time to serve Defendant Emily Barker. Id. at 1. Plaintiff also requests that the Court find “service has otherwise been sufficiently perfected on Defendant CCBOE upon a proper agent for service of process or, in the alternative, seeks additional time for service via alternative means.” Id. at 1. The Court ordered Plaintiff to supplement her motion with a specified request of time necessary to serve defendants and additional information on her purported service of process on CCBOE. See Order 2, ECF No. 9. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a defendant is served within

90 days after a complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If service does not occur within that timeframe, the Court, on motion or on its own, "must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Id. However, “if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id. The Fourth Circuit has made clear that although good cause necessitates an extension of the service period, “a district court possess discretion to grant the plaintiff an extension of time to serve a defendant with the complaint and summons even absent a showing of good cause.” Gelin v. Shuman, 35 F.4th 212, 219 (4th Cir. 2022). The Court finds Plaintiff has shown good cause for failure to serve Defendant Barker, after a diligent search, and that an extension of an additional sixty days from Plaintiff’s response, as

requested by Plaintiff, is reasonable. Pl.’s Resp. to the Court’s Order 1, ECF No. 10. The Court, in its discretion, also extends the time for service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) on CCBOE, given that the Court takes no position on whether Plaintiff has perfected service upon CCBOE. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff's time to serve the relevant defendants with process is EXTENDED by 55 days from the issuance of this order. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this written Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: January 13, 2026

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

HUNTINGTON DIVISION

L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-0587

CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is a Motion to Show Cause and for Leave for Additional Time to Serve Process filed by Plaintiff L.C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E.C., a minor child. ECF No. 8 (“Pl.’s Mot.”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. This action arises out of Plaintiff’s American Disability Act claim and associated counts for alleged conduct against a minor that occurred at a Cabell County Board of Education (CCBOE) school that employed Defendant Emily Barker. Compl. 1, ECF No. 1. Since filing the complaint on October 3, 2025, Plaintiff claims she has been unable to locate an address for Defendant Emily Barker after diligent search. Pl.’s Mot. ¶ 10. Plaintiff requests additional time to serve Defendant Emily Barker. Id. at 1. Plaintiff also requests that the Court find “service has otherwise been sufficiently perfected on Defendant CCBOE upon a proper agent for service of process or, in the alternative, seeks additional time for service via alternative means.” Id. at 1. The Court ordered Plaintiff to supplement her motion with a specified request of time necessary to serve defendants and additional information on her purported service of process on CCBOE. See Order 2, ECF No. 9. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a defendant is served within

90 days after a complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). If service does not occur within that timeframe, the Court, on motion or on its own, "must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Id. However, “if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id. The Fourth Circuit has made clear that although good cause necessitates an extension of the service period, “a district court possess discretion to grant the plaintiff an extension of time to serve a defendant with the complaint and summons even absent a showing of good cause.” Gelin v. Shuman, 35 F.4th 212, 219 (4th Cir. 2022). The Court finds Plaintiff has shown good cause for failure to serve Defendant Barker, after a diligent search, and that an extension of an additional sixty days from Plaintiff’s response, as

requested by Plaintiff, is reasonable. Pl.’s Resp. to the Court’s Order 1, ECF No. 10. The Court, in its discretion, also extends the time for service of process pursuant to Rule 4(m) on CCBOE, given that the Court takes no position on whether Plaintiff has perfected service upon CCBOE. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff's time to serve the relevant defendants with process is EXTENDED by 55 days from the issuance of this order. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this written Opinion and Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: January 13, 2026

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

L. C., individually and as the parent and guardian of E. C., a minor child v. CABELL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, EMILY BARKER, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-c-individually-and-as-the-parent-and-guardian-of-e-c-a-minor-child-wvsd-2026.