L. Balk Co-operative Co. v. International Fur Workers Union

Supreme Court of New Jersey

L. Balk Co-operative Co. v. International Fur Workers Union

123 A. 298, 95 N.J. Eq. 691, 10 Stock. 691, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 880

DecidedJanuary 10, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A. 298 (L. Balk Co-operative Co. v. International Fur Workers Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L. Balk Co-operative Co. v. International Fur Workers Union, 123 A. 298, 95 N.J. Eq. 691, 10 Stock. 691, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 880 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The record in this ease discloses that the two appellants, Milton Corbett and Perry Goldenburg, were convicted in the court of chancery of contempt of court of violating an injunction order of that court. Our reading of the record leads us to the conclusion that the conviction of Milton Corbett should be affirmed. The conviction of Perry Golden-burg should be reversed, on the ground that the evidence doesn’t satisfy us that Perry Goldenburg intentionally violated the injunction order of that court beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment of conviction as to Milton Corbett is affirmed, the judgment of conviction of Perry Goldenburg is reversed and set aside.

On appeal of Corbett— For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Hefeenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11. For reversal—Minturn—-1. [695]*695On appeal of Goldenburg— For affirmance—None. For reversal—The Chiee-Justice, Teen chard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, White, HepPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BuSKIRK—12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The record in this ease discloses that the two appellants, Milton Corbett and Perry Goldenburg, were convicted in the court of chancery of contempt of court of violating an injunction order of that court. Our reading of the record leads us to the conclusion that the conviction of Milton Corbett should be affirmed. The conviction of Perry Golden-burg should be reversed, on the ground that the evidence doesn’t satisfy us that Perry Goldenburg intentionally violated the injunction order of that court beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment of conviction as to Milton Corbett is affirmed, the judgment of conviction of Perry Goldenburg is reversed and set aside.

On appeal of Corbett— For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Hefeenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11. For reversal—Minturn—-1. [695]*695On appeal of Goldenburg— For affirmance—None. For reversal—The Chiee-Justice, Teen chard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbacii, White, HepPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BuSKIRK—12.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A. 298, 95 N.J. Eq. 691, 10 Stock. 691, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-balk-co-operative-co-v-international-fur-workers-union-nj-1924.