L & A Contracting Co. v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of Florida

L & A Contracting Co. v. Dorsey

170 So. 2d 40

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 21, 1964

DocketNo. 33811

StatusPublished

This text of 170 So. 2d 40 (L & A Contracting Co. v. Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

L & A Contracting Co. v. Dorsey, 170 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 2, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 2, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 So. 2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-a-contracting-co-v-dorsey-fla-1964.