Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso

30 A.D.3d 1089, 815 N.Y.S.2d 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.3d 1089 (Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kyung Mi Lee v. Musso, 30 A.D.3d 1089, 815 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered June 2, 2005. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated.

Memorandum: The failure of defendant to support his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint with a copy of the complaint requires denial of the motion, regardless of the merits of the motion (see CPLR 3212 [b]; D.J. Enters. of WNY v Benderson, 294 AD2d 825 [2002]; Niles v County of Chautauqua, 285 AD2d 988 [2001]). Present—Kehoe, J.P, Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered June 2, 2005. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated.

Memorandum: The failure of defendant to support his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint with a copy of the complaint requires denial of the motion, regardless of the merits of the motion (see CPLR 3212 [b]; D.J. Enters. of WNY v Benderson, 294 AD2d 825 [2002]; Niles v County of Chautauqua, 285 AD2d 988 [2001]). Present—Kehoe, J.P, Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.3d 1089, 815 N.Y.S.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyung-mi-lee-v-musso-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack