Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York

253 A.D.2d 793, 677 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9562

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 21, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant’s water and sewer tax bills are invalid, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Colar, J.), entered July 1,1997, which dismissed the action as time-barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 217.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action is time-barred (see, 45435 Realty Co. v City of New York, 200 AD2d 501; Renley Dev. Co. v Town Bd., 106 AD2d 717; Matter of Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant’s water and sewer tax bills are invalid, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Colar, J.), entered July 1,1997, which dismissed the action as time-barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 217.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action is time-barred (see, 45435 Realty Co. v City of New York, 200 AD2d 501; Renley Dev. Co. v Town Bd., 106 AD2d 717; Matter of Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York, 253 A.D.2d 793, 677 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

253 A.D.2d 793 (Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related