Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York

253 A.D.2d 793, 677 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 793 (Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kyu Chang Yoon v. City of New York, 253 A.D.2d 793, 677 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant’s water and sewer tax bills are invalid, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Colar, J.), entered July 1,1997, which dismissed the action as time-barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 217.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The instant action is time-barred (see, 45435 Realty Co. v City of New York, 200 AD2d 501; Renley Dev. Co. v Town Bd., 106 AD2d 717; Matter of Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

184 Kent Avenue Associates v. Miele
271 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 793, 677 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyu-chang-yoon-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.