Kyrelis v. OneWest Bank, FSB

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kyrelis v. OneWest Bank, FSB

89 So. 3d 256, 2012 WL 385476, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2012

DocketNo. 3D11-1730

StatusPublished

This text of 89 So. 3d 256 (Kyrelis v. OneWest Bank, FSB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kyrelis v. OneWest Bank, FSB, 89 So. 3d 256, 2012 WL 385476, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs, the record, and applicable law, the Court summarily affirms the final judgment of foreclosure pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). The record demonstrates that during the non-jury trial, OneWest Bank, FSB, established that it was holder of the note, and introduced into evidence the original note and mortgage dated July 9, 2007, and Kyrelis’ loan payment history, which reflects no payment since March 2008.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs, the record, and applicable law, the Court summarily affirms the final judgment of foreclosure pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). The record demonstrates that during the non-jury trial, OneWest Bank, FSB, established that it was holder of the note, and introduced into evidence the original note and mortgage dated July 9, 2007, and Kyrelis’ loan payment history, which reflects no payment since March 2008.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 So. 3d 256, 2012 WL 385476, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyrelis-v-onewest-bank-fsb-fladistctapp-2012.