Kyle v. United States. No. Undocketed

199 F.2d 756, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1952
Docket756_1
StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 756 (Kyle v. United States. No. Undocketed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kyle v. United States. No. Undocketed, 199 F.2d 756, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428 (9th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

199 F.2d 756

KYLE,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. Undocketed.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1952.

Arnold Thomas Kyle, in pro. per.

No other appearances were entered.

Before STEPHENS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arnold Thomas Kyle, the petitioner herein, has petitioned the United States District Court for the District of Oregon for a speedy trial or dismissal of an indictment returned to the above mentioned district court. The petition was denied in toto and petitioner seeks to appeal in forma pauperis and has presented his application to this court for permission to do so.

No showing is made that such a petition for permission to appeal in forma pauperis has been made or presented to the court from which the appeal has been taken, and for that reason the petition is denied. Smith v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F.2d 152-155; Minntole v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 944; see also In re Snow, 9 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 1006.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Johnston
109 F.2d 152 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Minntole v. Johnston
147 F.2d 944 (Ninth Circuit, 1945)
In re Snow
147 F.2d 1006 (Ninth Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 F.2d 756, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyle-v-united-states-no-undocketed-ca9-1952.