Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Kyle v. State

Kyle v. State

1919 OK CR 64, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 685, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 20, 1919
DocketNo. A-3075.
StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 64 (Kyle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kyle v. State, 1919 OK CR 64, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 685, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jim Kyle, was convicted of keeping a place in the town of Wirt, Carter county, with the felonious intent of there selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771. the statute upon which the prosecution was based was held unconstitutional. For the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 64, 178 P. 893, 15 Okla. Crim. 685, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyle-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.