Kyle v. Conn

2 Ky. 186, 1 Sneed 186, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 62
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 27, 1802
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 2 Ky. 186 (Kyle v. Conn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kyle v. Conn, 2 Ky. 186, 1 Sneed 186, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 62 (Ky. Ct. App. 1802).

Opinion

This day came the parties aforesaid by their attorneys, and being-heard and the court being sufficiently advised of and concerning the premises, are of opinion that the court below erred in refusing to grant the defendant in the said court leave to set aside the office judgment at any time during the term, and to allow the said defendant to make defense as to the merits of the case. Therefore, it is considered by the court that the judgment aforesaid be reversed and set aside; that the cause be remanded to the court from whence it came for new proceedings to be had therein to commence by allowing the said office judgment to be set aside, and the defendant to make defense as to the merits of the suit, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant in this court his costs in this behalf expended, which is ordered to be certified to the said court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellison v. Garber
287 S.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1955)
Marlin v. Merrill
156 S.W.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1941)
Couch v. Hoover
79 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1934)
Morris v. Morris
10 S.W.2d 277 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Henson v. Henson
151 Tenn. 137 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1924)
Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.
150 Tenn. 633 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1924)
Curriden v. Chandler
108 A. 296 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1919)
Gill v. McKinney
140 Tenn. 549 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1918)
Goodlett v. Goodman Coal & Coke Co.
192 F. 775 (Sixth Circuit, 1912)
Scott v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.
123 Tenn. 258 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1910)
Driscoll v. Driscoll
77 P. 471 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Shugart v. Shugart
111 Tenn. 179 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Balling v. Manhattan Savings Bank & Trust Co.
110 Tenn. 288 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Bunnell v. Bunnell
64 S.W. 420 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1901)
Davis v. Garrett
18 S.W. 113 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1892)
McEwen v. Bamberger
71 Tenn. 576 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1879)
Ledgerwood v. Gault
70 Tenn. 643 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1879)
Nichol v. County of Davidson
3 Tenn. Ch. R. 547 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1877)
Watson v. Ryan
3 Tenn. Ch. R. 40 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1875)
Gardner v. Brown
88 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ky. 186, 1 Sneed 186, 1802 Ky. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyle-v-conn-kyctapp-1802.