Kyle M. Jaeger and Jaeger REO Holding Trust v. Scott Brown
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00040-CV __________________
KYLE M. JAEGER AND JAEGER REO HOLDING TRUST, Appellants
V.
SCOTT BROWN, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-05-06244-CV __________________________________________________________________
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION
On August 4, 2022, we issued our original opinion in this case,
conditionally affirming the trial court’s judgment and suggesting a
remittitur, which when combined totals $247,500. See Tex. R. App. P.
46.3. We further provided that should the appellee, Scott Brown, file a
remittitur within fifteen days from the date of our opinion and agree to
1 accept the proposed remittitur, we would reform the trial court’s
judgment, reducing the trial court’s awards of economic and punitive
damages to the amounts the evidence supported and then affirm the
judgment as reformed, except for the amount awarded to Brown for
attorney’s fees. On August 19, 2022, Brown filed a remittitur with the
Clerk of the Court, in which he stated he would accept the remittitur, as
suggested by the Court. In the remittitur that Brown filed, he asked the
Court to affirm the economic and exemplary damages awards as
reformed.
Because Brown agreed to the proposed remittitur, we issue this
supplemental opinion. In accordance with our original opinion and
Brown’s timely-filed remittitur, the trial court’s judgment is reformed as
follows. The trial court’s economic and exemplary damages awards are
reduced by $247,500, which represents a reduction of $83,500 of the
amount awarded in the original judgment as economic damages and a
reduction of $165,000 of the amount awarded in the original judgment as
exemplary damages. Consequently, page two of the trial court’s Final
Default Judgment, as reformed, states:
It is ORDERED, ADJUDED and DECREED that Scott Brown, Plaintiff, shall have as JUDGMENT against Kyle M. 2 Jaeger and the Jaeger Reo Holding Trust, Defendants, the following:
Economic Damages in the amount of $409,250.00. Exemplary Damages in the amount of $818,500.00.
To the extent the judgment awards attorney’s fees to Scott Brown,
the Court REVERSES the attorney’s fees award, and we REMAND the
case to the trial court for further proceedings solely on Brown’s claims
against Kyle M. Jaeger and the Jaeger Reo Holding Trust on the issue of
attorney’s fees, if any, recoverable under the theories raised by Brown in
Plaintiff’s Original Petition. And since the appellants did not challenge
the trial court’s awards of prejudgment or post-judgment interest in their
appeal from the trial court’s judgment, those awards are affirmed.
Because the appellants were successful in only a small part of their
appeal, we order costs of the appeal assessed ninety percent (90%)
against the appellants and ten percent (10%) against the appellee. Based
on the above, the trial court’s judgment, with the exception of the
attorney’s fees awarded in the trial court’s judgment, is affirmed as
reformed. The Court’s original opinion explaining how the Court resolved
the issues raised in the appeal remains in effect.
3 We order the Court’s decision certified below for observance.
AFFIRMED AS REFORMED IN PART, REVERSED AND
REMANDED IN PART.
_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Submitted on September 28, 2021 Opinion Delivered September 8, 2022
Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kyle M. Jaeger and Jaeger REO Holding Trust v. Scott Brown (Kyle M. Jaeger and Jaeger REO Holding Trust v. Scott Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.