Kyle Jackson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 27, 2016
Docket01-16-00253-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kyle Jackson v. State (Kyle Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kyle Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Opinion issued September 27, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00253-CR ——————————— KYLE JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2075847

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kyle Jackson, pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor offense of assault

of a family member. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with

the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 355 days’ incarceration in county jail with 2 days credit. Appellant filed a pro se

notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s

permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed

if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made

part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The

trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant

has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial

court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See

Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals,

while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is

permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without

further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kyle Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyle-jackson-v-state-texapp-2016.