Kyle Irving Ahart v. Randall Noe Ford LLP
This text of Kyle Irving Ahart v. Randall Noe Ford LLP (Kyle Irving Ahart v. Randall Noe Ford LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 28, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00935-CV
KYLE IRVING AHART, Appellant
V.
RANDALL NOE FORD LLP, Appellee
On Appeal from the 86th Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 99344-86
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 22, 2019 second motion for an extension of time
to file his brief. The motion was filed in response to our December 14, 2018 letter informing
appellant his brief was deficient and directing him to file, within ten days, a corrected brief that
complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4, 9.5, and 38.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4,
9.5, 38.1. Apparently misconstruing our letter, however, appellant’s motion seeks an extension
with respect to a brief tendered to the Court November 20, 2018. That brief was filed December
5, 2018, after appellant’s first extension motion was granted. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is
DENIED AS MOOT. On our own motion, we EXTEND the deadline for filing the corrected brief and
ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 8, 2019. Appellee may file any amended brief
within fifteen days of the filing of appellant’s corrected brief.
We caution appellant that failure to file a corrected brief may result in dismissal of the
appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kyle Irving Ahart v. Randall Noe Ford LLP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyle-irving-ahart-v-randall-noe-ford-llp-texapp-2019.