Kyle Eustace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kyle Eustace v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 30, 2018

Docket5D17-2465

StatusPublished

This text of Kyle Eustace v. State (Kyle Eustace v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kyle Eustace v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KYLE EUSTACE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-2465

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 4, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge.

Paula C. Coffman and Jeffrey D. Deen, of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Orlando, and Lori D. Loftis, Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. See Daniels v. State,

200 So. 3d 195, 196 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). The trial court orally dismissed the condition (9) violation but the written order states otherwise. Accordingly, we remand this cause

for correction of the order.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI