Kyle Damond Jones v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 2020·No. 05-20-00435-CR·Published

Opinion

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed April 15, 2020

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00435-CR

KYLE DAMOND JONES, Appellant V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C19-0973

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns and Justices Myers and Carlyle Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Kyle Damond Jones has appealed the trial court’s determination to issue a

warrant for his arrest. Appellant has also filed an emergency motion requesting relief. Concluding we do not have jurisdiction, we deny the motion and dismiss the appeal.

This Court may only review criminal appeals authorized by statute. Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (authorizing defendant’s right to appeal “under the rules hereinafter prescribed”). Generally, criminal defendants may appeal only from final judgments. See State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Unless a

statute expressly grants a right of appeal, interlocutory orders are not appealable. See Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 52; Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

In this case, appellant’s appeal comes at a preliminary stage of the proceedings. The trial court’s determination to issue an arrest warrant is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order. See Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.) (listing appealable interlocutory orders and concluding determination to revoke bond not appealable); Bridle v. State, 16 S.W.3d 906, 908 n.1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, no pet.) (listing appealable interlocutory orders). Thus, we have no jurisdiction to consider appellant’s appeal. See Ragston, 424 S.W.3d at 52; Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 794.

In the absence of jurisdiction, we must dismiss the appeal without taking further action. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We deny appellant’s emergency motion for relief. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 200435F.U05

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

KYLE DAMOND JONES, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law, Rockwall County, Texas.

No. 05-20-00435-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. C19-0973.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Burns. Justices Myers and Carlyle participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered April 15, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kyle Damond Jones v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Kyle Damond Jones v. State of Texas (Kyle Damond Jones v. State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bridle v. State
16 S.W.3d 906 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Apolinar v. State
820 S.W.2d 792 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
State v. Sellers
790 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ragston, Joshua Dewayne
424 S.W.3d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)