Kyle Bratton v. Holt Texas, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 28, 2020·No. 04-20-00234-CV·Published

Opinion

FILE COPY

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2020

No. 04-20-00234-CV

Kyle BRATTON,

Appellant

v.

HOLT TEXAS, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CI05583 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed within fifteen days after the deadline but without a motion for extension of time to file the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. On August 17, 2020, we ordered Appellant to file a written response presenting a reasonable explanation for the late notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).

Appellant timely filed a written response explaining the late notice of appeal; our August 17, 2020 order is satisfied. See Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 774 S.W.2d 668, 670 (Tex. 1989) (noting a “reasonable explanation” comprises all but “deliberate or intentional noncompliance”).

We reinstate the appellate timetable. Appellant’s brief is due on September 16, 2020.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2020.

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kyle Bratton v. Holt Texas, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Kyle Bratton v. Holt Texas, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas (Kyle Bratton v. Holt Texas, LTD D/B/A Holt CAT and D/B/A Sitech-Tejas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.
774 S.W.2d 668 (Texas Supreme Court, 1989)