Kyi-Ung Dzung v. Cocolichio
This text of 4 A.D.2d 876 (Kyi-Ung Dzung v. Cocolichio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to impress a trust on real property, the appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion, made four years after the action had been placed on the calendar, to take his own testimony by written interrogatories in Hong Kong. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 876, 167 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kyi-ung-dzung-v-cocolichio-nyappdiv-1957.