Kyekyeku Opoku-Pong v. Priscilla Boahemaa

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: February 26, 2019
• Docket: 14-19-00070-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Order filed February 26, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-19-00070-CV ____________

KYEKYEKU OPOKU-PONG, Appellant

V.

PRISCILLA BOAHEMAA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1105370

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 17, 2018. The notice of appeal was due January 16, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on January 25, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM