Kwik Kopy Corporation, International Center for Entrepreneurial Center for Entrepreneurial Development, Inc.,a ND Franklin's Systems, Inc. v. Philip F. Peterson, Mary T. Peterson, John M. Peterson, and Kopytek, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 1, 2002
Docket01-01-01004-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kwik Kopy Corporation, International Center for Entrepreneurial Center for Entrepreneurial Development, Inc.,a ND Franklin's Systems, Inc. v. Philip F. Peterson, Mary T. Peterson, John M. Peterson, and Kopytek, Inc. (Kwik Kopy Corporation, International Center for Entrepreneurial Center for Entrepreneurial Development, Inc.,a ND Franklin's Systems, Inc. v. Philip F. Peterson, Mary T. Peterson, John M. Peterson, and Kopytek, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kwik Kopy Corporation, International Center for Entrepreneurial Center for Entrepreneurial Development, Inc.,a ND Franklin's Systems, Inc. v. Philip F. Peterson, Mary T. Peterson, John M. Peterson, and Kopytek, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 1, 2002



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas



NO. 01-01-01004-CV



KWIK KOPY CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.; AND FRANKLIN'S SYSTEMS, INC., Appellants



V.



PHILIP F. PETERSON, MARY T. PETERSON, JOHN M. PETERSON, AND KOPYTEK, INC., Appellees



****



PHILIP F. PETERSON, MARY T. PETERSON, JOHN M. PETERSON, AND KOPYTEK, INC., Appellants





KWIK KOPY CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.; AND FRANKLIN'S SYSTEMS, INC., Appellees



On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 97-42468



O P I N I O N

The Court abated this appeal on May 16, 2002 for the purpose of allowing the parties to complete their settlement agreement. The parties have since filed a joint motion for summary reversal and remand, in which they request this Court to remand the case to the trial court so that their settlement can be completed and a second modified judgment can be entered. The motion is granted as follows:

(1) The Court lifts the abatement and reinstates the appeal.



  • The trial court's modified final judgment signed on September 6, 2001 is reversed.


(3) The case is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter the second modified judgment that has been agreed upon by the parties.



PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Schneider and Justices Nuchia and Radack.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kwik Kopy Corporation, International Center for Entrepreneurial Center for Entrepreneurial Development, Inc.,a ND Franklin's Systems, Inc. v. Philip F. Peterson, Mary T. Peterson, John M. Peterson, and Kopytek, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwik-kopy-corporation-international-center-for-entrepreneurial-center-for-texapp-2002.