Kwasigroch v. FDC Seatac

7 F. App'x 590
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 22, 2001
DocketNo. 99-35195; D.C. No. CV-98-1564-RSL
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 F. App'x 590 (Kwasigroch v. FDC Seatac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kwasigroch v. FDC Seatac, 7 F. App'x 590 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Grzegorz Kwasigroch, a former federal detainee, appeals pro se the dismissal without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) of his civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), against an unknown official who handled his legal mail. He contends that he stated a claim for violation of his constitutional rights. Kwasigroch was civilly detained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service pending his deportation, and thus was not a prisoner subject to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139 (9th Cir.2000). Nonetheless, in his complaint he sought only injunctive or declaratory relief regarding his mail. Because Kwasigroch no longer is detained, this action is moot. Mitchell v. Dupnik, 75 F.3d 517, 528 (9th Cir.1996).

DISMISSED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

(PC) Vasquez v. Mayberg
E.D. California, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 F. App'x 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwasigroch-v-fdc-seatac-ca9-2001.