Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

368 F.2d 330, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 1966
Docket15409_1
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 368 F.2d 330 (Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kwang Shick Myung v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 368 F.2d 330, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506 (7th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of deportation, denying his application for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C.A. sec. 1254(a) (1).

The critical issue is whether deportation of petitioner would cause him “extreme hardship.” Petitioner argues that the inquiry officer applied an improper standard in finding that it would not.

Petitioner is 26 years old. He came to the United States from Korea at age 18, after completing high school. He attended college here, studying political science, and received a degree. He has attended *331 law school and is employed by a patent law firm. His family, consisting of his mother, three brothers, and a sister live in Korea. Although he believes the only employment he could secure in Korea would be in his brother’s fishing business, one brother is a newspaper editor and the other a publisher. He testified that he would be unable to read intellectual writing in Korean because Chinese characters are used. These forms are taught at college level, and petitioner had his college work in the United States.

Petitioner testified: “I am to'o much Americanized at this moment to return to Korea and struggle for my living.”

The inquiry officer was convinced that petitioner’s life in Korea would be different from that in the United States, and that he would not be able to obtain employment comparable to that in the United States, but concluded that “these facts alone do not constitute extreme hardship.”

We cannot conclude that the hearing officer applied an improper standard, nor that the finding was arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion.

The order is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SIPUS
14 I. & N. Dec. 229 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1972)
LAM
14 I. & N. Dec. 98 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 F.2d 330, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwang-shick-myung-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca7-1966.