Kwality Foods LLC v. Babco Foods International LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 14, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-03260·Unknown

Opinion

In the United States District Court For the Southern District of New York

Kwality Foods LLC, § Plaintiff § § Civil Action: 1:24-cv-3260 (PKC) v. § § (Jury Demanded) Babco Foods International LLC, et § al. § Defendants § Stipulated Protective Order THE COURT FINDS that Kwality Foods LLC, Babco Foods International LLC, Everest Holdings Ltd., and Pure Ice Cream Co. LLC (each a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”) have agreed to this Protective Order governing the protection of confidential information and tangible things in the above-captioned litigation (i.e., otherwise “action” or “case”). THE COURT ORDERS the Parties, subject to further orders of the Court, to adhere to the following terms for the protection of confidential information and tangible things. 1. Purposes and Limitation 1.1. Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, trade secret, and/or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 1.2. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery, and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information and tangible things that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 2. Definitions 2.1. Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation or non- designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material under this Order. 2.2. Competitor: The term’s ordinary meaning in the context of the subject matter of the Parties’ respective businesses. 2.3. Confidential Protected Material: Protected Material (regardless of how it is

generated, stored or maintained) that qualifies for protection under FED. R. CIV. P. 26(c), or the disclosure of which may cause harm to a Party or Non-Party. 2.4. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5. Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that designates, or that has a reasonable expectation of the right to designate, Protected Material as Confidential Protected Material or Highly Confidential Protected Material. 2.6. Disclosure or Discovery Material: All information and tangible things, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, documents, testimony and transcripts), that are produced, disclosed or used in this action.

2.7. Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to this action who (1) has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as a testifying or consulting expert in this action, (2) is not a current employee or contractor of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, (3) has not been an employee of or contractor of a Party at any point during the previous five years, and (4) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee or contractor of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 2.8. Highly Confidential Protected Material: Confidential Protected Material, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means, including but not limited to: proprietary design and development materials for products and/or services, sensitive products and/or services, and strategic decision-making

information. 2.9. House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10. Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11. Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that Party. 2.12. Party: Any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs).

2.13. Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.14. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors as well as e-discovery vendors and discovery contract attorneys. 2.15. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Protective Order. 2.16. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. Scope The protections conferred by this Protective Order cover not only

Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material, (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material, and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. The protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain, including through trial or otherwise, after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, another Court’s Order, unlawful conduct, or a breach of a confidentiality obligation to the Designating Party. However, if the accuracy of information is confirmed only through the review of Protected

Material, then the information will not be considered to be in the public domain. For example, unsubstantiated media speculations or rumors that are later confirmed to be accurate through access to Protected Material are not “public domain” information. Such information is included in the definition of “Protected Material” set forth in §2.15 above. Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. Duration Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition will be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice, and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and

exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law and the time limits for filing a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, if applicable. 5. Designating Protected Material 5.1. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates Disclosure or Discovery Material for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that Disclosure or Discovery Material that it designated for protection does not qualify for protection at all or does not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all

other Parties that it is withdrawing or revising the mistaken designation. 5.2. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kwality Foods LLC v. Babco Foods International LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Kwality Foods LLC v. Babco Foods International LLC (Kwality Foods LLC v. Babco Foods International LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)