Kwaku Agyin v. State
Opinion
Jfourtl) Court of
September 09. 2013
No. 04-12-00750-CR
Kwaku Agyin, Appellant
v.
The Slate of Texas. Appellee
Trial Court Case No. 2012CR0469
() IIDER
The Court has reviewed the reeord and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid ii in determining the legal and (actual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. Api1. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on Tuesday, October 08. 2013. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Marion, and Justice Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with Ti-ix.R. Ait. P. 48.
Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. Sec Te.v R. Ait. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the dale of this order.
Il is so ORDERED on Monday. September 09, 2013.
0 Catherine Stone. Chief Justice
/ / IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ihe sal of the court on this Monday. September 09, 2013.
L '&itft I-:, .rlotte. Cerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kwaku Agyin v. State (Kwaku Agyin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.