K.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

K.W. v. State

600 So. 2d 566, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244, 1992 WL 139016

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1992

DocketNo. 91-2451

StatusPublished

This text of 600 So. 2d 566 (K.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.W. v. State, 600 So. 2d 566, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244, 1992 WL 139016 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive issue on this appeal is the admissibility of the juvenile’s confession. We agree with the trial judge’s conclusion, specifically distinguishing the case from B.S. v. State, 548 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), that “[i]n this case, the child is the one who initiate[d] the phone call to the police office.... [Ujnder the totality of the surrounding circumstances ... the [567]*567statements were freely and voluntarily given.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The dispositive issue on this appeal is the admissibility of the juvenile’s confession. We agree with the trial judge’s conclusion, specifically distinguishing the case from B.S. v. State, 548 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), that “[i]n this case, the child is the one who initiate[d] the phone call to the police office.... [Ujnder the totality of the surrounding circumstances ... the [567]*567statements were freely and voluntarily given.”

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

600 So. 2d 566, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7244, 1992 WL 139016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kw-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack