Kvandal v. Westminster Presbyterian Society of Buffalo, Inc.

254 A.D.2d 818, 678 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10547
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 818 (Kvandal v. Westminster Presbyterian Society of Buffalo, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kvandal v. Westminster Presbyterian Society of Buffalo, Inc., 254 A.D.2d 818, 678 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying that part of defendant’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence causes of action. Kurtis K. Kvandal (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant, was injured when he stepped off a ladder onto a nail while performing drywall work on premises owned by defendant. Although a representative of defendant visited the worksite daily to observe the progress of the project, the record contains no proof that defendant actually supervised or controlled work to sustain those causes of action (see, e.g., Riley v Stickl Constr. Co., 242 AD2d 936; Adamczyk v Hillview Estates Dev. Corp., 226 AD2d 1049, 1050).

The court properly denied, however, that part of defendant’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. Plaintiffs allege that defendant violated 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (e) and 23-2.1 (b) by permitting a nail to remain on the floor of the worksite. Those regulations set forth specific standards of conduct that are sufficient to support the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action (see generally, [819]*819Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 502-504). Plaintiffs raised triable issues of fact whether those standards were violated.

Consequently, we modify the order by granting in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence causes of action. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vega v. FNUB, Inc.
192 N.Y.S.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
ST. JOHN, KATHLEEN v. WESTWOOD-SQUIBB PHARMACEUTICALS, IN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
St. John v. Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
138 A.D.3d 1501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
DIPALMA, JEFFREY v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
DiPalma v. State
90 A.D.3d 1659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
McCormick v. 257 W. Genesee, LLC
78 A.D.3d 1581 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Coleman v. ISG Lackawanna Services, LLC
74 A.D.3d 1825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Scally v. Regional Industrial Partnership
9 A.D.3d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Donnelly v. City of Niagara Falls
5 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Alexandre v. City of New York
300 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Riccio v. Shaker Pine, Inc.
262 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 818, 678 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kvandal-v-westminster-presbyterian-society-of-buffalo-inc-nyappdiv-1998.