Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance

848 A.2d 925, 577 Pa. 667, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 743
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 5, 2004·No. Petitions 543, 544 MAL 2003·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2004, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED.

*668 In addition, the parties are directed to address the appropriate test or inquiry in ascertaining whether an underlying claim sounds in contract or tort for purposes of insurance coverage. Compare Redevelopment Auth. of Cambria Co. v. Intern. Ins. Co., 454 Pa.Super. 374, 685 A.2d 581 (1996) (en banc) with Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., 806 A.2d 936 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002), appeal granted, 573 Pa. 713, 827 A.2d 1203 (2003) and Tenos v. State Farm Ins. Co., 716 A.2d 626 (Pa.Super.1998).

This matter is consolidated for argument with Freestone v. New England Log Homes, Inc., 77 WAL 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance, 848 A.2d 925, 577 Pa. 667, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 743 (Pa. 2004).

848 A.2d 925 (Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jaskula v. Essex Insurance
900 A.2d 931 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Donegal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Baumhammers
893 A.2d 797 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)