Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance

848 A.2d 925, 577 Pa. 667, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 743

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 5, 2004

DocketPetitions 543, 544 MAL 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 848 A.2d 925 (Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner U.S., Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance, 848 A.2d 925, 577 Pa. 667, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 743 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2004, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED.

*668 In addition, the parties are directed to address the appropriate test or inquiry in ascertaining whether an underlying claim sounds in contract or tort for purposes of insurance coverage. Compare Redevelopment Auth. of Cambria Co. v. Intern. Ins. Co., 454 Pa.Super. 374, 685 A.2d 581 (1996) (en banc) with Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., 806 A.2d 936 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002), appeal granted, 573 Pa. 713, 827 A.2d 1203 (2003) and Tenos v. State Farm Ins. Co., 716 A.2d 626 (Pa.Super.1998).

This matter is consolidated for argument with Freestone v. New England Log Homes, Inc., 77 WAL 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2004, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are hereby GRANTED.

*668 In addition, the parties are directed to address the appropriate test or inquiry in ascertaining whether an underlying claim sounds in contract or tort for purposes of insurance coverage. Compare Redevelopment Auth. of Cambria Co. v. Intern. Ins. Co., 454 Pa.Super. 374, 685 A.2d 581 (1996) (en banc) with Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., 806 A.2d 936 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002), appeal granted, 573 Pa. 713, 827 A.2d 1203 (2003) and Tenos v. State Farm Ins. Co., 716 A.2d 626 (Pa.Super.1998).

This matter is consolidated for argument with Freestone v. New England Log Homes, Inc., 77 WAL 2003.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

848 A.2d 925, 577 Pa. 667, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kvaerner-metals-division-of-kvaerner-us-inc-v-commercial-union-pa-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack